Evidence in. Governed assessment out.
The assurance layer enterprises need before an AI system reaches production — controls mapped to named obligations, evidence with owners and dates, and a governed assessment that says where the system stands.
See how an assessment is builtTenant Screening Assistant (RE-4)
AIGX Real Estate v1.0 · Risk class: High
Critical gate open
Retention and deletion evidence not supplied. The gate holds the decision at Conditional regardless of the Governance Score of 72.
The buyer already owns the obligation. AIGX supplies the measurement.
Enterprises must now demonstrate that AI systems are governed, explainable, secure and continuously monitored. The obligations are fragmented. The evidence is not.
Mapped controls, not policy statements
Overlapping regimes demand controls tied to named obligations and evidence a reviewer can trace.
Deployment blocked without assurance
Real estate, finance and government buyers will not sign until governance can be compared across vendors and AI-enabled workflows.
Governance does not end at launch
Model changes, incidents and revalidation make assurance a continuous requirement, not a one-time review.
Most organizations hold the left-hand column. AIGX operates on the right.
| What enterprises hold today | What buyers and regulators ask for |
|---|---|
| Policy documents and principles | Controls mapped to named obligations |
| Spreadsheets and email evidence trails | Traceable evidence with owners and dates |
| Self-declared maturity levels | Independently reviewed, comparable scores |
| Point-in-time reviews at launch | Continuous monitoring and re-rating |
| Averaged scorecards that hide failures | Explicit blocker states and a go / no-go decision |
Three surfaces. One evidence model behind all of them.
Assessment and platform are available today. Independent rating issuance is being established as the Index builds a body of completed assessments.
Governance assessment
A fixed-scope engagement that maps controls to obligations, collects evidence and returns a remediation roadmap.
Governance platform
Multi-tenant evidence, scoring, approvals, monitoring and executive reporting across the whole AI portfolio.
Index rating
Designed so that independent review converts validated evidence into an AIGR™ designation and a procurement-ready report.
Every sector framework runs on the same infrastructure.
Shared evidence, scoring and rating machinery — so a new sector is a new framework, not a new product.
Framework
Sector controls, risk classes, evidence requirements and scoring criteria.
Assessment
Evidence is mapped, blockers identified and a remediation roadmap set.
Platform
Evidence, scoring, approvals and monitoring in one multi-tenant system.
Rating
Independent review is designed to convert validated evidence into an AIGR™ designation.
Surveillance
Monitoring, expiry and material change are designed to trigger re-assessment across the portfolio.
Every requirement carries an artifact, an owner and a reviewer state.
Nothing is scored on assertion. A control is either evidenced, in review, or blocked.
- PropTech & vendor governance
- 12 / 12 evidenced
- Model validation
- 10 / 10 evidenced
- Human oversight & appeals
- 8 / 9 evidenced
- Smart-building monitoring
- 6 / 7 evidenced
- Third-party & vendor controls
- 5 / 6 evidenced
- Data governance & privacy
- 7 / 11 evidenced
| Control | Requirement | Artifact | Owner | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RE-04 | Human review of adverse applicant decisions | Applicant review protocol v3 | Leasing Operations | Validated |
| MV-02 | Valuation and applicant-model performance | Validation report Q2 | Data Science | Validated |
| DP-07 | Retention and deletion | Not supplied | Privacy | Blocker |
| HO-03 | Appeal and override logging | Audit log export | Compliance | In review |
| MO-05 | Smart-building drift thresholds | Monitoring config | PropTech Operations | Validated |
| TP-01 | PropTech vendor attestation | Supplier attestation | Procurement | In review |
A strong average never masks a severe failure.
Critical-gate logic holds the rating independently of the Governance Score. Five dimensions can pass and one open gate still returns Conditional.
- PropTech & vendor governance91
- Model validation84
- Human oversight & appeals78
- Smart-building monitoring71
- Third-party & vendor controls66
- Data governance & privacy42
DP-07 · gate open
Supply retention and deletion evidence for applicant, property and inference data to clear the gate.
Different entry points. Common evidence model and assessment infrastructure.
AIGX Real Estate
Tenant and applicant decisions, valuation AI, PropTech and vendor governance, smart-building operations, privacy and human oversight.
AIGX Finance
Model risk, explainability, fairness, third-party controls and regulatory reporting.
AIGX Health
Clinical safety, evidence traceability, human oversight, privacy and lifecycle monitoring.
AIGX Government
Public accountability, transparency, rights and safety, records and oversight.
What makes an assessment defensible.
Published criteria, separated issuance and a documented appeal path — the disciplines an assessment has to hold to become comparable.
The AIGX Governance Score™ is the 0–100 analytical measure. The AIGR™ designation, AIGR-100 to AIGR-40, is the operative rating published for executive interpretation.
Blocker states prevent strong averages from masking severe safety, privacy or security failures.
The framework is designed to separate platform workflow and remediation support from rating issuance and reviewer approval.
Completed assessments build controlled sector cohorts and maturity benchmarks under consent and confidentiality rules.
Mapped to the frameworks your auditors and regulators already use.
AIGX™ is designed to support organizations in assessing AI governance maturity and mapping governance practices to internationally recognized AI governance, risk, security, privacy and compliance frameworks.
- ISO/IEC 42001AI management systems
- ISO/IEC 23894AI risk management guidance
- NIST AI RMFGovern, map, measure, manage
- ISO 31000Enterprise risk management
- ISO/IEC 27001Information security management
- ISO/IEC 27701Privacy information management
- SOC 2Trust services criteria
- EU AI ActRisk-tiered obligations for AI systems
- OECD AI PrinciplesIntergovernmental AI policy principles
- UNESCO RecommendationEthics of artificial intelligence
Disclaimer
AIGX™ assessments and ratings are independent governance evaluations and do not constitute certifications, regulatory approvals, legal opinions, or attestations of compliance. References to third-party standards, regulations, and frameworks are provided for alignment purposes only and do not imply affiliation, endorsement, sponsorship, or certification by their respective owners.
Bring one AI system. We will show you where it stands.
A walkthrough maps one of your AI systems to the relevant framework and shows the gates that would hold a rating today.
Request a demo